ArticlesThinking About Using an Illinois Style Land Trust-Why Would You Do That?Earl H. Cohen and Jeffrey C. O’BrienClients will often come to us to discuss the next great planning “Holy Grail.” In the tax area the Holy Grail was the Constitutional Trust that would assure them the elimination of all of their state and federal income tax liability. In the asset protection area it was the off-shore trust that couldn’t be pierced by a creditor and in the real estate area, the Illinois style land trust that would provide anonymity and presumably asset protection from creditors. What seems to be so logical often isn’t. Just because the Illinois Land Trust has been successfully used in Illinois, trying to apply the same rules to Minnesota property can have very unpredictable consequences. While some may say the trust is legal, legality should not be the prime or only concern. An Illinois land trust involves titling property you’re purchasing in the name of a trustee, usually a bonded corporate trust organization that has been organized for the purpose of holding title to many residential and commercial properties. The trust agreement, containing the name of the beneficiary is not recorded at the state or county level. Thus its primary benefit is providing anonymity since there is no public record showing the identity of the beneficial owner. Lenders in Illinois have developed a mortgage lending system that allows working with land trusts. Lenders operating in other states, including Minnesota, likewise have to work within the statutory, title and legal framework of those states. So what are some of the issues and problems that individuals potentially face using such a land trust for homestead property? They include the following:
For real estate investors proposing to use a land trust to own their investment properties, there exists a more sensible alternative; namely, the limited liability company (“LLC”). The LLC provides for limited liability to its owner, meaning that the LLC owner’s personal assets are shielded from liability arising with respect to the property. Ask some investors what their rationale is for using a land trust as opposed to a LLC and you will likely get this response: “the land trust provides for complete anonymity for the beneficiaries.” An LLC, however, can provide similar anonymity. For example, there is no requirement that the individual members of the LLC be disclosed in the LLC’s articles of organization or its annual reports (only the names of governors and managers must be disclosed). Regardless, absolute anonymity is not a necessity for real estate investment, especially given the strong limitations on personal liability provided by the Minnesota Limited Liability Company Act. One final advantage of the LLC form of ownership over the land trust: legal precedent. That is, Minnesota courts have addressed numerous issues related to limited liability companies; a similar body of controlling law does not exist for Illinois Land Trusts. The existence of controlling legal precedent is of great importance to professional advisors who rely on such precedent to advise clients as to a particular course of action. While still considered “new” by legal standards (the first LLC statute was enacted in Wyoming in 1977), the LLC has become the vehicle of choice for real estate ownership. This trend will likely continue in the years to come, and investors would be wise to use this known quantity instead of ownership structures with less certain legal effect. Earl H. Cohen and Jeffrey C. O’Brien are partners with Mansfield Tanick & Cohen, P.A. Each has significant experience in advising real estate investors as to the proper ownership structure for their holdings. They can be reached at 800-4016-194. |



